RLEDC — Rural Labor & Economic Development Corporation Rural Labor & Economic Development Corporation
Dealing with Data Centers: Due Diligence for Our Grandchildren — book cover
The Book This Page Supports

Dealing with Data Centers: Due Diligence for Our Grandchildren

A Common-Sense Risk Management Guide for Rural Communities in the AI Era — ten documented case studies, sixty-four fiduciary tools, model clause language your county attorney can put to work, and the compliance program that keeps those terms enforceable for fifty years.

Buy on Amazon — paperback & Kindle →

Free to read with Kindle Unlimited.

It starts at a public meetingThree part-time officials, a twenty-minute slide deck, and a fifty-year decision.
Legitimate industry, priced honestlyNot a villain, not a savior — a counterparty. Yes, priced.
The beneficiaries can't attend the hearingThey're in the elementary school, or not yet born. The paperwork is for them.
Water, quiet, land, and the gridA county's inheritance, managed like the trust it is.

Front and back

309 pages. Ten documented case studies, sixty-four fiduciary tools, model clause language, and the compliance program that keeps negotiated terms enforceable for fifty years.

Front cover of Dealing with Data Centers: two children looking out over a river
                valley toward a data center campus at sunrise.
Front cover
Back cover showing the nine due-diligence topics as illustrated panels: water use,
                power demand, noise, land use, decommissioning, tax incentives, jobs, transparency,
                and utility loopholes — each keyed to its chapter.
Back cover — the nine topics, keyed to their chapters

Get your copy →

Paperback & Kindle · free to read with Kindle Unlimited

Verified Update

The Record Through 29 July 2026

Sources verified on the date shown. Legislative status changes weekly — re-verify any item before citing it in a hearing, an application review, or a staff report.

1. New York: the first statewide moratorium actually takes effect

Executive Order No. 62, signed 14 July 2026, effective immediately. New York became the first state in the country to impose a statewide data center permitting pause. The order directs the Department of Environmental Conservation to stop issuing discretionary permits for construction or expansion of data centers consuming 50 MW or more, for up to one year, while the Department of Public Service develops a Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Applications deemed complete before 14 July 2026 are exempt.

The order also directs Empire State Development to publish a Community Investment Framework within sixty days; directs DPS to consider a Grid Acceleration Fund and protection against stranded-asset risk; and continues the Energize NY proceeding requiring large loads either to pay more for energy or supply their own. The Governor is separately pursuing repeal of the sales tax exemption for large facilities.

Both columns, as always. The order is not the bill. The Responsible Data Center Development Act (S.10642 / A.11560) passed both houses in June 2026 at a 20 MW threshold, with local hearing requirements and renewable standards the order does not contain. As of this update the bill has not been delivered to the Governor. It must be sent before 31 December 2026, after which she has ten days to sign, negotiate a chapter amendment, or veto. Anyone citing "New York's moratorium" should say which instrument they mean.

Sources: Executive Order No. 62 · Governor's release, 14 July 2026 · Community Investment Framework outline

2. The ratepayer firewall keeps hardening

3. Water: from disclosure to prohibition

Idaho H.B. 895 — signed 2 April 2026; applies to construction beginning after 1 July 2026. Enacted. Data centers breaking ground after that date may not use water for cooling as a consumptive use unless it comes from a municipal, water district, or water-and-sewer district system. The legislative findings state expressly that data center water consumption conflicts with the local public interest.

Most 2025–2026 water legislation required reporting. Idaho restricted the source. That changes the closed-loop conversation entirely: the question becomes where the make-up water comes from, not how much is used.

4. The second ledger: incentives under review

5. Moratorium bills: twelve states, and one that failed

Good Jobs First documents moratorium bills filed in at least twelve states — Georgia, Maryland, Vermont, Virginia, New York, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina and others — ranging from one year to four. Named bills worth tracking: Georgia H.B. 1012, Maryland H.B. 120, Minnesota S.F. 4298, South Dakota S.B. 232 and H.B. 1301, Virginia H.B. 1515, Vermont S.205 (a pause through July 2030), and New York S.9144 (a three-year permit freeze, separate from the Act above). All introduced; none enacted as of this update.

Correction to an earlier note. Ohio's proposed constitutional amendment to restrict data centers above 25 MW failed to qualify for the 2026 ballot. Backers gathered roughly 70,000 of the 413,488 signatures required by the 1 July deadline and have said they intend to try again in 2027. Earlier versions of this page described the initiative as advancing; that is no longer accurate.

6. Where the center of gravity still is

More than 100 municipalities have adopted or considered local pauses, and at least fourteen states have introduced or considered statewide ones. Two local items are useful as procedural templates: Sunbury, Pennsylvania, where the council certified a citizen-led charter amendment on 15 July 2026 sending a data center cap to the 3 November ballot; and San Angelo, Texas, where a recall petition against the mayor over a proposed project reached the council agenda in July 2026.

Both illustrate the Chapter 5B point from the other direction: when a board has no adopted standard to decide against, the dispute migrates from the hearing record to the ballot.

7. The count

As of 1 July 2026, states had enacted 109 AI laws and 28 data center laws in the 2026 sessions — slightly behind the 2025 pace at the same date (121 and 27), against a 2025 full-year total of 159 and 37. More than 300 data center bills were introduced across 30 states in the first six weeks of 2026 alone.

Counts and trackers: NYU Center on Technology Policy via Tech Policy Press; MultiState Policy Watch; Good Jobs First; ArentFox Schiff state survey.


Standing caveat. Statuses are labelled as of 29 July 2026 — introduced, passed one chamber, enacted, or executive order. None of this is legal advice. Every item is a starting point for your county counsel, not a substitute for their research under your own state's law.

A number, a meter, a deadline — kept current

The data center policy landscape moves weekly. Settlements get approved, moratoriums adopted and challenged, ordinances tested in court. Registered readers get the book's reference layer, maintained:

Case Status Ledger

Morrow County, Project Jupiter, the Digital Gateway, The Dalles — current docket status with the qualifiers a fair account requires.

Updated as filed
Moratorium Tracker

The running record of local, state, and federal pauses — adopted, vetoed, litigated — with citations your county counsel can pull.

Verified monthly
Model Clause Updates

Revisions to the book's 64 fiduciary tools as courts and legislatures test the underlying doctrines.

Counsel-ready specs
Workshop Materials

Board training decks, the Plain-Talk Q&A handouts, and the 18-month moratorium roadmap for study committees.

For boards & citizens

Open the library

We ask for your email for one reason: so RLEDC can notify you when the law changes under something you have relied on. Free registration · no spam, no sales · unsubscribe anytime.

By registering you agree to receive occasional verified-update notices and workshop invitations from RLEDC. We never sell or share your address. This page uses essential local storage only (no ad-tracking or analytics cookies). See our Privacy Notice.

Privacy & data use

What we collect & why

Name (optional), email address (required), and county/organization (optional) — used only to send verified case-status and moratorium updates related to this book, and occasional workshop invitations from RLEDC.

How it's handled

Your choices

Every update email includes an unsubscribe option, or you may email isabelle@rledc.org anytime to opt out or request your information be deleted.

Who this is for

This resource is intended for local officials, professionals, and adult community members. It is not directed to, and does not knowingly collect information from, children under 13.

RLEDC is a registered 501(c)(3): EIN 41-3513223, 723 E Route 66 Blvd., Tucumcari, NM 88401. Full policy: rledc.org/privacy.html.